cost vs cost of quality

cost of quality vs cost

cost and cost of quality both are nouns.

cost is a verb but cost of quality is not a verb.

Word	Noun	Adjective	Verb	Adverb
cost	Yes	No	Yes	No
cost of quality	Yes	No	No	No

As nouns, cost of quality is a hyponym of cost; that is, cost of quality is a word with a more specific, narrower meaning than cost:

cost: the total spent for goods or services including money and time and labor
cost of quality: a means to quantify the total cost of quality-related efforts and deficiencies.

Other hyponyms of cost include disbursal, disbursement, expense, capital expenditure, payment, ransom, ransom money, cost overrun, cost of living, borrowing cost, distribution cost, handling charge, handling cost, marketing cost, production cost, replacement cost, physical value, reproduction cost, unit cost, damage, price, terms, price, opportunity cost, portage, charge, transaction cost, quality cost, direct cost.

cost (noun)	cost of quality (noun)
the property of having material worth (often indicated by the amount of money something would bring if sold)	a means to quantify the total cost of quality-related efforts and deficiencies.
value measured by what must be given or done or undergone to obtain something
the total spent for goods or services including money and time and labor

cost (verb)	cost of quality (verb)
be priced at
require to lose, suffer, or sacrifice

Difference between cost and cost of quality

© WordCmp.com 2024, CC-BY 4.0 / CC-BY-SA 3.0.