harm vs cryopathy

cryopathy vs harm

harm and cryopathy both are nouns.

harm is a verb but cryopathy is not a verb.

Word	Noun	Adjective	Verb	Adverb
harm	Yes	No	Yes	No
cryopathy	Yes	No	No	No

As nouns, cryopathy is a hyponym of harm; that is, cryopathy is a word with a more specific, narrower meaning than harm:

harm: any physical damage to the body caused by violence or accident or fracture etc.; the condition of an injury
cryopathy: destruction of tissue by freezing and characterized by tingling, blistering and possibly gangrene

Other hyponyms of harm include brain damage, birth trauma, blast trauma, bleeding, haemorrhage, hemorrhage, blunt trauma, bruise, contusion, bump, burn, dislocation, electric shock, break, fracture, frostbite, intravasation, penetrating injury, penetrating trauma, pinch, rupture, bite, insect bite, sting, strain, whiplash, whiplash injury, wale, weal, welt, wheal, lesion, wound, pull, twist, wrench.

harm (noun)	cryopathy (noun)
the act of damaging something or someone	destruction of tissue by freezing and characterized by tingling, blistering and possibly gangrene
the occurrence of a change for the worse
any physical damage to the body caused by violence or accident or fracture etc.; the condition of an injury

harm (verb)	cryopathy (verb)
cause or do harm to

Difference between harm and cryopathy

© WordCmp.com 2024, CC-BY 4.0 / CC-BY-SA 3.0.